kdevelop-pg and kdevelop-pg-qt

[Andreas Pakulat]

On 11.08.09 11:21:51, Matt Rogers wrote:
> On Tuesday 11 August 2009 02:52:01 am Andreas Pakulat wrote:
> > On 10.08.09 20:59:49, Matt Rogers wrote:
> > > Is there a reason why kdevelop-pg and kdevelop-pg-qt haven't been
> > > released?
> > 
> > Nobody cared for a release, they're only used for stuff you have to
> > build from trunk/ currently anyway. And that stuff is usually optional
> > even
> > 
> > > Does one supersede the other?
> > 
> > kdevelop-pg-qt "was" just a port to Qt types (instead of stl), but got
> > quite some fixes/enhancements since then. kdevelop-pg hasn't been
> > touched since ages.
> > 
> > > Does anybody care if I spin 0.1 releases of one or both of these?
> > 
> > Feel free to do so, might even cause the distro's to pick it up if we
> > make the usage non-optional.
> > 
> > > Does anybody also care if I make them compile within the larger context
> > > of playground/devtools rather than having to compile them standalone?
> > 
> > As long as this doesn't sacrifice the existing CMakeLists.txt files
> > in kdevelop-pg-qt. (I don't care too much about the non-qt version)
> 
> Is there anybody left using the stl version? If not, I'll just remove it.

There might be plugins in playground/devtools/kdevelop4-extra-plugins
which haven't been ported (I think the ruby one). So removing might not
be a good idea. Moving to unmaintained is probably better.

Andreas

-- 
You will triumph over your enemy.