apaku at gmx.de
Tue Apr 22 13:42:00 UTC 2008
On 22.04.08 15:02:05, Alexander Dymo wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 2:36 AM, Andreas Pakulat <apaku at gmx.de> wrote:
> > > Since the first part is focussed mostly on QxRunner it seems best to work in
> > > in a local scm for now, instead of directly on the kdevelop svn? I rather not
> > > be responsable for breaking kdev4 builds :)
> > Well, the thing is that at some point we probably want to get the code
> > into KDE's svn and still preserve history. This isn't always easily
> > possible when using any XXX-svn bridges. Also its easier for me to track
> > the progress because we have a mailinglist that gets all svn-commits
> > mailed to.
> That's of course true, but for DVCS project I'd prefer using Git just
> to make sure we eat our own dogfood right from the beginning.
Yes, that makes total sense. If you manage to find a way to work with
git and still get the result back into svn please let us know.
You will be attacked by a beast who has the body of a wolf, the tail of
a lion, and the face of Donald Duck.
More information about the KDevelop-devel