branches/KDE/3.5/kdevelop/lib/astyle

[Dirk Mueller]

On Friday, 21. September 2007, Matt Rogers wrote:

> > b) KDE/3.5/kdevelop/ is now "dead", i.e. its not the stable KDevelop
> > anymore (as of 2 or 3 weeks ago). Would you mind comitting this change
> > to branches/kdevelop/3.5/ as well?

(sorry did not get the original mail)

Uh boy, I'm entirely sick of kdevelop moving around where it develops 
something twice per year. if you think you have to reinvent a new place where 
you develop kdevelop just because you're bored, then please make sure that 
patches are ported over to your current playground as well. 

> > @KDevelop developers: Should we ask the release-team about removing
> > branches/KDE/3.5/kdevelop? Also that would make sure the next KDE
> > release won't release kdevelop from branches/KDE/3.5/kdevelop...

Just telling release-team that you don't want to have kdevelop released will 
fix the issue. and then you can use branches/KDE/3.5/kdevelop to develop 
whatever you want. 


> Sorry, but these changes need to stay since we're distributing the
> astyle source code with KDevelop. Having this pushed up to astyle
> upstream is nice, but not a requirement.

The stuff is already pushed upstream as astyle fails compilation too. In any 
case there is probably a reason for kdevelop including a deep copy of astyle 
instead of using the system installed version, but it can't be a requirement. 

Also I agree, you should really decide if you want to focus on KDevelop4 or 
just play games with branches. 


Greetings,

Dirk