[RFC] s/Part/Plugin/

Alexander Dymo dymo at ukrpost.ua
Fri Nov 23 15:28:51 UTC 2007

On Thursday 22 November 2007 22:44, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
> Are there any objections against doing so? (this will include
> classnames, member names and filenames)
No objections, only one more suggestion. We have filenames like foo_part.cpp 
and foopart.cpp. I'd like to ask whether we could standartize on just 
fooplugin.cpp without underscores?

More information about the KDevelop-devel mailing list