[RFC] s/Part/Plugin/

Andreas Pakulat apaku at gmx.de
Fri Nov 23 15:48:19 UTC 2007

On 23.11.07 17:28:51, Alexander Dymo wrote:
> On Thursday 22 November 2007 22:44, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
> > Are there any objections against doing so? (this will include
> > classnames, member names and filenames)
> No objections, only one more suggestion. We have filenames like foo_part.cpp 
> and foopart.cpp. I'd like to ask whether we could standartize on just 
> fooplugin.cpp without underscores?

That was my plan, some time ago Matt shouted out aloud (not directly at
me IIRC) that he'd like to see no underscores so I already changed
plugins I touched that use underscores in filenames.


Your talents will be recognized and suitably rewarded.

More information about the KDevelop-devel mailing list