REMINDER: Final review of VCS interfaces

[Andreas Pakulat]

On 29.05.07 13:41:10, Matthew Woehlke wrote:
> Andreas Pakulat wrote:
> > Depending on the capabilities of the plugin you might get an
> > invalid revision if you ask for a type that doesn't exist.
> 
> ...except that we recently removed the concept of an invalid revision. 
> Maybe we shouldn't have done that? :-)

Right (that we removed it). I think we need to stop this now here and
then start with an implementation for VcsRevision. I think we'll find
out what we need then.

> (Or we could always return a valid revision that isn't what was asked 
> for; *Number is expected to do this anyway i.e. give back a *Number but 
> not necessarily the *Number asked for.)

Hmm, I don't particularly like that. 

Andreas

-- 
Bridge ahead.  Pay troll.