RFC: KDevelop4 icons, what do we want/need?

[Matthew Woehlke]

Jakob Petsovits wrote:
> On Wednesday, 31. January 2007, Matthew Woehlke wrote:
>> I had one other comment about the breakpoint icon. Do we really want to
>> use process-close for this? While I don't find the icon aesthetically
>> objectionable, to me the action of a breakpoint is not very well
>> represented by the 'close process' verb. I think I would rather have a
>> slightly different icon; maybe a stop sign as per the original draft?
> 
> It's process-stop, not process-close.
> (Look it up in the mail you replied to ;)
> 
> That's exactly the same "stop loading the document" icon that web browsers 
> use, and is practically a stop sign per definition. It's not (yet?) in 
> Tango's icon naming spec, but at least in its reference implementation 
> tarball, and there's no way that it won't belong to the final specification.

Ah... it (what KDev3.4 is using) just happens to *look* exactly like my 
'close window' buttons. Ok, I withdraw my comment, then. :-)

In that case, I will go ahead and commit the previously posted version 
in a day or so if no one had further comments.

-- 
Matthew
"I like to think of it as 'unplanned dissonance'" -- A fellow chorister