language support in 3.4 vs 4

[Hamish Rodda]

On Sunday 31 December 2006 13:28, Oliver Kellogg wrote:
> On Saturday, 30. December 2006 03:25, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
> > > What happened to the CodeModel?
> >
> > Hmm, there should still be one for C++, however I think the duchain is
> > playing a large role for C++ too. As for the other languages, there's
> > merely more than a AST-generating parser and a basic code-model (which
> > might be ripped apart again)
>
> Okay, what will the basic abstractions be?
> You mention duchain. Is that programming language independent?

Not currently but it is hopefully not too large a task to make it generic (at 
least for a subset of the current duchain).

The code model should have data supplied to it from the duchain.

I hope to write some documentation shortly (not that there isn't already some 
inside the code).

Cheers,
Hamish.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kdevelop-devel/attachments/20070103/bd40c349/attachment.sig>