branches/kdevelop/3.4/languages/cpp

[Andras Mantia]

On Monday 22 May 2006 23:22, Jens Dagerbo wrote:
> On Monday 22 May 2006 18:10, Andras Mantia wrote:
> > If you ask me, this is not acceptable at all. I better live with
> > worse code completion.
>
> I can't really agree with this. Sure, cppcodecompletion.cpp is a bit
> of a monster now and I agree that a cleanup is a good idea, but the
> current implementation actually often gives me proper completion,
> something I've rarely seen with C++. It would be silly to suggest to
> remove it and live with worse functionality just because the code
> structure is bad (the code itself isn't).

Jens, I didn't say anything about the behavior of the code itself, but 
if you happen to find one bug, and David is not around you will hit a 
hard wall when trying to fix it. Not talking about the fact that this 
should be ported to Qt/KDE4. I'm sorry I haven't reviewed when it was 
proposed, I trusted it is OK. 

There are some basic things what is missing here, and a reshuffling 
won't make a big deal (well, it would remove some nonsense, but that's 
all). 

And yes, I was angry when I wrote the above sentence. ;-)

Andras

-- 
Quanta Plus developer - http://quanta.kdewebdev.org
K Desktop Environment - http://www.kde.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kdevelop-devel/attachments/20060522/8998f198/attachment.sig>