branches/kdevelop/3.4/languages/cpp

David Nolden david.nolden at art-master.de
Mon May 22 20:03:28 UTC 2006


Am Montag, 22. Mai 2006 21:42 schrieb Andras Mantia:
> On Monday 22 May 2006 23:22, Jens Dagerbo wrote:
> > On Monday 22 May 2006 18:10, Andras Mantia wrote:
> > > If you ask me, this is not acceptable at all. I better live with
> > > worse code completion.
> >
> > I can't really agree with this. Sure, cppcodecompletion.cpp is a bit
> > of a monster now and I agree that a cleanup is a good idea, but the
> > current implementation actually often gives me proper completion,
> > something I've rarely seen with C++. It would be silly to suggest to
> > remove it and live with worse functionality just because the code
> > structure is bad (the code itself isn't).
>
> Jens, I didn't say anything about the behavior of the code itself, but
> if you happen to find one bug, and David is not around you will hit a
> hard wall when trying to fix it. Not talking about the fact that this
> should be ported to Qt/KDE4. I'm sorry I haven't reviewed when it was
> proposed, I trusted it is OK.
>
> There are some basic things what is missing here, and a reshuffling
> won't make a big deal (well, it would remove some nonsense, but that's
> all).
>
> And yes, I was angry when I wrote the above sentence. ;-)
>
> Andras

How far are you? I've thought about it.. I think it's better when I do it 
myself. After all it's much easier for me to do it then for you, since I know 
the code and by the way I could do some more cleanups like removing some 
global/static variables..

David




More information about the KDevelop-devel mailing list