Project loading problems

[Matt Rogers]

On Monday 31 July 2006 10:03, mwoehlke wrote:
> Matt Rogers wrote:
> > On Friday 28 July 2006 14:50, mwoehlke wrote:
> >> Matt Rogers wrote:
> >>> On Thursday 27 July 2006 15:37, mwoehlke wrote:
> >>>> Before I start filing bug reports, I'd like to check here for any
> >>>> suggestions in being as helpful as possible.
> >>>>
> >>>> I just built KDevelop 3.3.91 (the most recent source tarball I could
> >>>> find). I have had several crashes while trying to load a rather large
> >>>> project. Are the backtraces helpful, or is there something I could do
> >>>> to provide additional information?
> >>>
> >>> It would be useful if you could try a checkout of
> >>> anonsvn.kde.org/home/kde/branches/kdevelop/3.4 and see if the crashes
> >>> go away. Backtraces would be interesting if you've built kdevelop with
> >>> debug information.
> >>
> >> Ack. Naturally, now that I have rebuilt with --enable-debug=full, it
> >> doesn't crash. :-)
> >>
> >> At least if it does it again, I'll both know what to do, and will have a
> >> trace from a debug KDevelop.
> >>
> >>>> Also, as it takes several minutes to load the project, I decided to
> >>>> throw callgrind at KDevelop to investigate why this is. Would anyone
> >>>> be interested in the raw output, or should I just summarize?
> >>>
> >>> raw output of the callgrind output posted somewhere would be the most
> >>> useful, since then we'll be able to open it in kcachegrind, analyze it,
> >>> and fix the bottlenecks.
> >>
> >> Ok, is there anywhere good I can post it? I don't have any of my own
> >> webspace for that sort of use. (FWIW, I paid attention this last time;
> >> KDevelop took about 1:40 to fully start when opening my large project.)
> >> Also, is it expected to have three output files?
> >>
> >> I can at least make this observation: there is a 25% self cost to
> >> "tryit()", called by KMimeMagic::findFileType->process->tryit. About 90%
> >> of the calls come from methods of CppSupportPart; seems like a place to
> >> start looking, at least.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >
> > how large is the output? i might be able to find a place for you to put
> > it
>
> All three combined and bzip2'd are 3873340 (just under 3.7 MB). If
> nothing else, I'd be happy to simply e-mail it to you, but that probably
> is not the best solution for your end.

bzip2 file requested to be sent to me off list.
--
Matt