Status of Qt4 qmake support
Ian Reinhart Geiser
geiseri at yahoo.com
Mon Jul 31 15:03:35 UTC 2006
On Monday 31 July 2006 09:09, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
> On 31.07.06 08:47:33, Ian Reinhart Geiser wrote:
> > On Sunday 30 July 2006 17:05, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
> > > On 30.07.06 15:39:30, Ian Reinhart Geiser wrote:
[...]
> > Even if I could not edit them via the GUI though, just
> > having them parsed for SOURCE, HEADERS and UI files would be a big win.
>
> There's a comment inside the trollprojecwidget about pri-parsing,
> however no code and currently I'm rather reluctant about changing that.
> I'd much more like to work on integrating the AST from the qmake parser,
> which would simplify this a lot.
Hrm, I hope I didn't add that comment :P Yeah going the AST route is an
infinitely better solution. From what I remember the AST will be what is
used in KDevelop 4 (I am assuming you are working in KDevelop 3.4 right now,
correct?) so this is the best way to go. I harbor a secret hatred for the
regexp parser, even though I helped keep it around this long :)
> > The big problem is if we don't then KDevelop never knows about those
> > files, and they wont appear in the class view.
>
> Yeah, the automake manager has similar "problems" with conditional
> sub-projects, i.e. the list of directories is "calculated" at configure
> time and thus the automake manager doesn't show any classes inside those
> directories in the class view.
>
> Let's see how far I get in the next couple of days...
If there is any stupid stuff I can do to help let me know. I have a few
examples that currently piss off KDevelop and MSVC :) I also have a few
senarios with project scopes that confuse our current parser. I attempted to
add edit support for scopes, but I think the regexp parser, along with the
old "ill randomly reorder lines when I dump the .pro file" feature made it
very confusing to me.
Cheers
-ian reinhart geiser
More information about the KDevelop-devel
mailing list