New parser branch (Was: Dumping the source DOM?)
ghost at cs.msu.su
Wed Jul 13 12:43:04 UTC 2005
Roberto Raggi wrote:
> On Wednesday 13 July 2005 11:31, Vladimir Prus wrote:
>> To make my position clear, I'm not biased against your work. If it can
>> parse Boost, then it's good enough for KDevelop.
> now I'll make my position clear. I don't care about boost! "good enough
> for KDevelop" is different from "be able to parser boost"!! parse a file
> doesn't mean nothing! Store and understand the code in realtime is the
> only important thing.
1. You do care about things like code refactoring and your parser will
2. You don't care if you parser can handle Boost. So basically, you're not
trying to making your parser accept all possible C++ code, but only C++
subset you're interested in?
More information about the KDevelop-devel