Gideon snapshot

[falk.brettschneider at gmx.de]

> >
> >
> >I never heard any objections to the proposal I raised before, which was
> to 
> >incorporate Gideon as a release with KDE 3.2 - just like Quanta is.  In
> fact, 
> >I've already told Stephan Kulow to do this.  
> >
> >This means that we're following the KDE 3.2 release timeline as posted on
> the 
> >KDE website.
I don't see a contradiction to the additional internal dates and release
rules I proposed. Of course, I never doubt the well-known KDE-3.2 release plan,
don't get me wrong, I don't object against that.

> We have fixed 151 bugs since Alpha4. So I really think that we need an 
> Alpha5 in a week or so.
> The Alpha that is synced with KDE could then be named Alpha6.
This is exactly also my intention! It would fully fit in the KDE-3.2 release
cycle.

> 
> Regarding recomending KDevelop3 over KDevelop2.x, we have fixed 390 bugs 
> since the last
> KDevelop2.x (OK, of these 390 only 105 where from the KDevelop2.x 
> series, the rest was
> Gideon related, but anyways...) so I have no prob whatsoever recomending 
> Gideon over
> KDevelop2.
Hehe, yeah, lots of bugs were fixed in countless hours.... lots were
introduced with new source code or due the new design approach compared to
KDevelop-2.x.

> 
> But with the 151 bugs closed since A4 a find it dificult to recomend A4.
Exactly.

> 
> Just my 2cent
> 
> -- 
> Amilcar Lucas
Ciao
F at lk

-- 
+++ GMX - Mail, Messaging & more  http://www.gmx.net +++
Bitte lächeln! Fotogalerie online mit GMX ohne eigene Homepage!