The result of the whole discussion about Gideon and 2.2 (was: Re: A common roadmap)

[Christoph Cullmann]

On Monday 01 April 2002 13:20, Christian Couder wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Richard Dale wrote:
> > I don't think reorganising the CVS like this is a good idea, either with
> > adding new branches or moving things around, or both. We might lose the
> > cvs history and that will make it harder to maintain both gideon and
> > KDevelop.
>
> I am not a CVS expert but I heard that there are hacks to do it properly
> and not lose anything.
>
> > I would prefer to either leave things as they are, or better give gideon
> > a new name (probably with a K in it) and move it to kdesdk.
>
> Anyway this would mean to lose gideon's CVS history if we are not able to
> hack cvs files properly.
>
> > If there is a
> > need for a common development kparts directory, that could go into kdesdk
> > too, and still be used by KDevelop.
>
> Then why not move KDevelop to kdesdk too ?
I don't think any of these "mega" apps should be in kdesdk, as kdesdk is a 
collection of some "small" utils for devs/i18n people.

>
> Bye,
> Christian.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Kdevelop-devel mailing list
> Kdevelop-devel at barney.cs.uni-potsdam.de
> http://barney.cs.uni-potsdam.de/mailman/listinfo/kdevelop-devel

-- 
Christoph Cullmann
Kate/KDE developer
cullmann at kde.org
http://kate.kde.org