The result of the whole discussion about Gideon and 2.2 (was: Re: A common roadmap)

[Christian Couder]

Hi,

Richard Dale wrote:
>
> I don't think reorganising the CVS like this is a good idea, either with
> adding new branches or moving things around, or both. We might lose the cvs
> history and that will make it harder to maintain both gideon and KDevelop.

I am not a CVS expert but I heard that there are hacks to do it properly and 
not lose anything.

> I would prefer to either leave things as they are, or better give gideon a
> new name (probably with a K in it) and move it to kdesdk.

Anyway this would mean to lose gideon's CVS history if we are not able to 
hack cvs files properly.

> If there is a
> need for a common development kparts directory, that could go into kdesdk
> too, and still be used by KDevelop.

Then why not move KDevelop to kdesdk too ?

Bye,
Christian.