The day of reunification is here (was Re: The day of seperation is here)

Christoph Cullmann cullmann at babylon2k.de
Wed Mar 27 23:37:04 UTC 2002


On Thursday 28 March 2002 00:27, Christian Couder wrote:
> On Wednesday 27 March 2002 15:16, Cornelius Schumacher wrote:
> > On Tuesday 26 March 2002 :01, Roland Krause wrote:
> > > Ooops, very sorry for sending the last email.
> > > I hit the browser send button, and feel like the fool I am right now.
> > >
> > > Anyway, friends, the day of seperation is here, lets get it over now.
> > >
> > > A fork can no longer be prevented.
> > >
> > > We have two possibilities.
> > >
> > > 1 Rename gideon to KDevelop, and move KDevelop under a new name to
> > > kdenonbeta. The name I like to suggest is Kollide.
> > >
> > > 2 Move gideon to kdenonbeta and leave its name.
> >
> > Why not put gideon in a subdirectory of the non-gideon kdevelop and make
> > this combined code the only kdevelop branch? This would allow to identify
> > duplicated code, move common code to libraries or parts and work towards
> > merging the two flavours of KDevelop.
>
> Hi everybody,
>
> I agree with this proposal. I think there are now a lot of common parts
> that can be improved and benefit to both branches of KDevelop, thanks to
> many of you guys. So it would be stupid to keep separate branches because
> it would mean many merges back and forth for a long time.
>
> On the other hand, as Cornelius said, if we get one HEAD branch, it will
> simplify things a lot and it will make it possible to merge (once and for
> all) and then improve a lot of good code.
>
> I don't know if a full of merge of KDevelop and Gideon will be possible,
> but I don't care much about such a merge or not. If people find different
> needs for these applications then fine, let there be two apps that share as
> much as possible. If people find that they can integrate all the KDevelop
> and Gideon features in a unique IDE then it's great two.
>
> If I dared I would also propose to put KDevelop and Gideon in the kdesdk
> directory, because I think we should also try in KDevelop and Gideon to use
> as much as possible, as KParts, the code from there.
What has the location of kdevelop in cvs to do with the use of kparts ?

>
> Bye,
> Christian.
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Kdevelop-devel mailing list
> Kdevelop-devel at barney.cs.uni-potsdam.de
> http://barney.cs.uni-potsdam.de/mailman/listinfo/kdevelop-devel

-- 
Christoph Cullmann
Kate/KDE developer
cullmann at kde.org
http://kate.kde.org




More information about the KDevelop-devel mailing list