KDevelop 3.0, this mailinglist and Bernd

[Ralf Nolden]

Richard Dale wrote:
> I'm happy to work on either version of KDevelop 3.0, but I agree getting
> something which works and then improving it, is more likely to get the project
> moving. I'm trying to get the KDE Java bindings ready for KDE 2.2, and I'm keen
> to have an IDE to go with them in order to try and make KDE/Qt java programming
> popular.
> 
> If I manage to do a java patch for KDevelop 2.0, would it be possible
> to have a 'KDevelop extras' directory for patches like that? I don't mind it
> not going into the 2.0 CVS, because C++ stability should be the most important
> thing for release 2.0 as per the roadmap.

Sure, but I wouldn't spend too much effort on 2.0. I think we will
finish up what we have in store like the MDI stuff now and fix the
issues around that as it seems it's really a big change. There are still
some issues I encounter in 2.0 with the MDI handling such as the
switching and focus setting to the windows and en/disabling the
treeview/outputview as well as an entry in the view menu for disabling
that file-toolbar. Bernd's stuff is really close and I guess when we've
decided to go for that we will all join the effort and work on 3.0 as
soon as possible, so it'd be better to take care of bringing your stuff
into 3.0 as soon as possible.

Regards,

Ralf
-- 
Finally, even I have to admit that being myself was the best thing
that ever could have happened to me. - Le Grand Charmeur

**********************************
Ralf Nolden

The KDevelop Project
http://www.kdevelop.org

nolden at kde.org
rnolden at kdevelop.org
**********************************



-
to unsubscribe from this list send an email to kdevelop-devel-request at kdevelop.org with the following body:
unsubscribe »your-email-address«