KDevelop 3.0, this mailinglist and Bernd

[Richard Dale]

On Wed, 28 Mar 2001, Sandy Meier wrote:
> On Mittwoch, 28. Mrz 2001 16:02, you wrote:
> > He said he's got it working so far and will have it ready for public
> > working by the end of next week. The idea behind it is that he realized
> > noone (except Omid, Richard and others) is working on HEAD (kdevelop
> > 3.0). To change that, we need a *working* version of Kdevelop to attract
> > other developers. That is e.g. the case with Konqueror where now that it
> > works and is released a lot of plugins are developed for it and khtml is
> > getting better each day by the additions of other developers. To create
> > the same scenario for kdevelop, we need to do a similar thing - which
> > will have the "surprise, surprise" effect to everyone. 
> I like this idea. I also worked many hours on KDevelop3 in the last years, 
> but if this new IDE by Bernd (still based on KDevelop3) will boost the new 
> development it was worse the effort. I don't know how much Bernd already 
> "ported", but if not I think we can add the rest. :-)

I'm happy to work on either version of KDevelop 3.0, but I agree getting
something which works and then improving it, is more likely to get the project
moving. I'm trying to get the KDE Java bindings ready for KDE 2.2, and I'm keen
to have an IDE to go with them in order to try and make KDE/Qt java programming
popular. 

If I manage to do a java patch for KDevelop 2.0, would it be possible
to have a 'KDevelop extras' directory for patches like that? I don't mind it
not going into the 2.0 CVS, because C++ stability should be the most important
thing for release 2.0 as per the roadmap.

-- Richard

-
to unsubscribe from this list send an email to kdevelop-devel-request at kdevelop.org with the following body:
unsubscribe »your-email-address«