KWrite update

[Roland Krause]

--- "F at lk Brettschneider" <gigafalk at yahoo.com> wrote:
> Roland Krause wrote:
> > 
> > Roland
> The pro is that Kate seems to have a well-designed architecture and a
> good maintainance.
> The con is that our 1_4 kwrite version is pretty stable and ready to
> use
> except the horizontal scrollbar problem.
> 

Gotta have a look at "Kate" :-) 

> One would decide for our kwrite version under the policy that 1_4 is
> dead after 2.0.
> Another one would decide for Kate under the policy that life goes on
> on
> branch 1_4.

Life goes on, it always does (/me singing that Beatles song... :-) 

Seriously, I was most interested in seeing how much has changed in the
core and whether these changes can be backported to KDEVELOP_1_4. To
me, it makes no sense even releasing KDEVELOP_1_4 has kdevelop-2 if we
are not serious with it. People *will* use this version for months if
not years. So I think, especially if Christian gives us a hand, it's
worthwhile. 

The big question is, can we define those parts of kwrite that we can
use in a black box manner? 

Roland




> 
> Ciao,
> F at lk
> 
> _________________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
> 
> 
> -
> to unsubscribe from this list send an email to
> kdevelop-devel-request at kdevelop.org with the following body:
> unsubscribe »your-email-address«

=====
--
Roland Krause
In the garage of life there are mechanics and 
there are drivers. Mechanics wanted!

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Auctions - buy the things you want at great prices
http://auctions.yahoo.com/

-
to unsubscribe from this list send an email to kdevelop-devel-request at kdevelop.org with the following body:
unsubscribe »your-email-address«