[kdepim-users] It shouldn't be this hard

[Ingo Klöcker]

On Wednesday 19 May 2010, Art Alexion wrote:
> Yesterday, I upgraded my KDE from 4,4,2 to 4.4.3. and again,
> nepomuk/akonadi broke.  I fixed it -- once again -- with my tried
> and true methods of removing the akonadi directories under ~/.config
> and ~/.kde/config.
> 
> I haven't had an upgrade involving akonadi that didn't break it.
> 
> But it shouldn't be this hard.  I'm a fairly technical user, and I
> find the instability of this technology troublesome.  This isn't 4.0
> anymore, We are up to 4.4, and the underlying KDE technologies are
> still unreliable.  I would no longer ever recommend KDE to a
> non-technical user.
> 
> While I still prefer the KDE apps, like kmail, konqueror, k3b, etc.,
> the KDE framework is far less stable than even Windows 98.
> 
> This is meant as a plea more than a complaint.  Please...

FWIW, after reading your message I have upgraded my KDE SC from 4.4.2 to 
4.4.3. After using 4.4.3 for the past few days without any problems I 
remembered your message.

I cannot confirm your observations. Quite the opposite. On openSUSE 11.2 
upgrading from 4.4.2 to 4.4.3 does not seem to introduce any problems or 
instabilities. So, as far as I can tell, the problems you are 
experiencing are either not caused by KDE but by your distro or you are 
using KDE PIM differently than me. I am mostly using KMail only, but I 
had a quick look at the address book and I didn't see or notice anything 
unusual.


Regards,
Ingo
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kdepim-users/attachments/20100522/629f2303/attachment.sig>
-------------- next part --------------
_______________________________________________
KDE PIM users mailing list
kdepim-users at kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-users