Trying to understand the scope of kdenlive

[Narcis Garcia]

I think it's not necessary TO BE if it can TO USE.
Kdenlive projects could dialog with other projects to compatibilize 
formats, exports and APIs; and this to allow software be called each other.

Not always is needed to reinvent the wheel but to improve each 
specialized wheel to run vehicle as a team.


Narcis Garcia

__________
I'm using this dedicated address because personal addresses aren't 
masked enough at this mail public archive. Public archive administrator 
should fix this against automated addresses collectors.
El 9/4/22 a les 8:53, Evert Vorster ha escrit:
> Hey there Zeke.
> 
> I am a long time user/tester of Kdenlive, and I certainly won't mind 
> more functionality in Kdenlive.
> 
> However, people are used to their workflows, and are resistant to 
> change, which is something to keep in mind when extending functionality 
> of any program. So, if what you have in mind adds to Kdenlive without 
> taking away that would certainly get my vote.
> 
> Of course, you would have to discuss your plans in-depth with the actual 
> developers of Kdenlive.
> 
> Kind regards,
> Evert Vorster
> Awesome Chapters Tours
> http://www.awesomechapters.com <http://www.awesomechapters.com>
> Tel: +264 (0) 811477690
> 
> 
> On Fri, 8 Apr 2022 at 17:16, Zeke Williams <lakeleaf8 at gmail.com 
> <mailto:lakeleaf8 at gmail.com>> wrote:
> 
>     Kdenlive strives itself to be the best premier pro alternative it
>     can be. Sadly, the one potential after effects alternative, natron,
>     is in a not so good shape right now with development and has been
>     for a few years. I want to in the future help out kdenlive, would
>     this team object to any kind of contributions to make kdenlive a
>     vfx/compositing program in addition to being a non linear video
>     editor? With all the effects it already has, I think it can manage
>     to evolve into premiere pro + after effects two in one, similar to
>     davinci resolve. What do you guys think?
>