[Kdenlive-devel] Kdenlive 0.8.4 bugfix release

[Gabriel Gazzán]

0.8.2.1 makes more sense to me, to indicate a hotfix upgrade.

Gabriel


2011/11/7 Evert Vorster <evorster at gmail.com>

> On 7 November 2011 02:34, Vincent PINON <vincent.pinon at st.com> wrote:
> > Alberto Villa wrote:
> >> On Monday 07 November 2011 00:45:10 jb wrote:
> >>> Great! At first I wanted to make it 0.8.2.1, but the changes will be
> more
> >>> important than first thought...  with at least 6-7 severe bug fixes.
> That's
> >>> why I thought 0.8.4 would be more appropriate.
> >>>
> >>> Anyways, I don't really care about these version's number, so if you
> think
> >>> 0.8.2.1 is better it's ok for me, as long as I manage to fix these
> issues.
> >> Not important at all. And your opinion on 0.8.4 makes sense. ;)
> > To my opinion 0.8.2.1 would be more appropriate to state that 0.8.2 is
> > not perfectly stable, and needs an upgrade without additional features,
> > even if code changes are not so light...
> > If I wanted to select an "old-stable" release I would take this into
> > account. Usually incrementing he "second significant digit" implies new
> > features, don't you think ?
>
> If I can add my 0.2...
>
> Changing the number of numbers in the release is a pain to handle in
> automated scripts for distrobution maintainers.
>
> Is Kdenlive ever going to get to a 1.0.0 release, or is the leading 0
> going to stay like that forever?
>
> In my opinion, kdenlive could follow the kernel dev's example, and the
> version be bumped to 1.0.0. Then the second significant digit ( 1.x.0
> ) can be used for extra feature releases, and last significant digit (
> 1.0.x ) for bugfix releases.
>
> In this manner, scripts can automatically pick up when a new release
> is available, and the distro maintainer's job is a lot easier. As the
> number of numbers in the release does not change.
>
> -Evert-
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> RSA(R) Conference 2012
> Save $700 by Nov 18
> Register now
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1
> _______________________________________________
> Kdenlive-devel mailing list
> Kdenlive-devel at lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kdenlive-devel
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kdenlive/attachments/20111108/e0e225eb/attachment.html>