[Kdenlive-devel] Kdenlive versionning

Le Coat Xavier lecoatx at gmail.com
Mon Jan 26 10:55:06 UTC 2009

 I don't know if it's a good way, and why 2.0 and not 1.0 ??

 In my way, I think a lot of users use kdenlive 0.5 and 0.6 cause they use
old distribution (hardy, feisty ...).

 Certainly, they want to keep their version of distrib. And actually, it
don't exist a complete package it install all dependancies of kdenlive
0.7.1 .

 For example, i had Ubuntu Studio Hardy to do MAO, but i love Kdenlive too.
But i never can install this new version with this distrib...

2009/1/26 Jean-Michel Pouré <jm at poure.com>

> A lot of users are complaining that Kdenlive 0.5 or 0.6 is not working.
> They don't understand that Kdenlive 0.7 is a complete rewrite. Should we
> rename Kdenlive 0.7.2 to Kdenlive 2.0? What do you think?
> Kind regards,
> Jean-Michel
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by:
> SourcForge Community
> SourceForge wants to tell your story.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword
> _______________________________________________
> Kdenlive-devel mailing list
> Kdenlive-devel at lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kdenlive-devel
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kdenlive/attachments/20090126/70b63639/attachment.html>

More information about the Kdenlive mailing list