"kde" bugs

[Oswald Buddenhagen]

On Thu, Nov 22, 2007 at 04:25:24PM +0100, Lubos Lunak wrote:
> On Thursday 22 of November 2007, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 22, 2007 at 03:46:30PM +0100, Lubos Lunak wrote:
> > > And kde-bugs-dist@ is not a real argument - if it was, we don't need
> > > this list.
> >
> > that's just wrong. [...]
> 
>  You got it backwards.
>
i didn't. i repeated the reasons for creating this list. i assumed you'd
realize that the reasoning is not directly applicable to "unsorted" and
thus the above statement is flawed logic.

> I'm not against this list, in fact I'm so much for it that I want it
> also for "kde".
> 
i realize this. but you wouldn't put login management functions into
kwin just because you happen to be the kwin maintainer, right? ;)

anyway, david creates unsorted-bugs@ and everybody is happy. we seem to
have at least one potential subscriber already. ;)

-- 
Hi! I'm a .signature virus! Copy me into your ~/.signature, please!
--
Chaos, panic, and disorder - my work here is done.