"kde" bugs

[Lubos Lunak]

On Thursday 22 of November 2007, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 22, 2007 at 03:46:30PM +0100, Lubos Lunak wrote:
> > And kde-bugs-dist@ is not a real argument - if it was, we don't need
> > this list.
>
> that's just wrong. you can neither expect the "generic bug sorters"
> (i.e., bugs-dist readers) to know to which developer to assign a bug to
> (even adding the missing libs would not help due to the distributed
> maintainership), nor can you expect core-devels to read bugs-dist to
> pick up "their" bugs. that's why kdelibs bugs went unhandled for years
> and that's what we fixed with kdelibs-bugs. we still need to handle the
> backlog, though ...

 You got it backwards. I'm not against this list, in fact I'm so much for it 
that I want it also for "kde".

 And there's a difference between screening the whole of kde-bugs-dist@ (if 
there are still any such brave souls) and just screening "kde".

-- 
Lubos Lunak
KDE developer
--------------------------------------------------------------
SUSE LINUX, s.r.o.   e-mail: l.lunak at suse.cz , l.lunak at kde.org
Lihovarska 1060/12   tel: +420 284 028 972
190 00 Prague 9      fax: +420 284 028 951
Czech Republic       http//www.suse.cz