"kde" bugs

[Oswald Buddenhagen]

On Thu, Nov 22, 2007 at 03:46:30PM +0100, Lubos Lunak wrote:
> And kde-bugs-dist@ is not a real argument - if it was, we don't need
> this list.
> 
that's just wrong. you can neither expect the "generic bug sorters"
(i.e., bugs-dist readers) to know to which developer to assign a bug to
(even adding the missing libs would not help due to the distributed
maintainership), nor can you expect core-devels to read bugs-dist to
pick up "their" bugs. that's why kdelibs bugs went unhandled for years
and that's what we fixed with kdelibs-bugs. we still need to handle the
backlog, though ...

-- 
Hi! I'm a .signature virus! Copy me into your ~/.signature, please!
--
Chaos, panic, and disorder - my work here is done.