Yet another post of KDE 4.2 impressions

[Thierry de Coulon]

On Saturday 28 March 2009, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
> This is intentional.  Users are generally focused on a task (in the
> description) and not a particular application (in the name).  This is even
> more true of newer users.

Why not give the choice? If I have to be told to do so because someone thinks 
the majority wants it so, I have Windows or Mac OS X

> It is still ready for the majority of end users
No. At least that's not what I see when I read my mailing lists.

> , and the KDE project is no 
> longer supporting KDE 3, so they recommend you upgrade.
They don't do it the right way (I mean instead of tempting us to make the move 
we are being threatened)

> KDE 4.2 still does not appear to have all the features KDE 3.5 had, but it
> is a lot better than KDE 3.2. :)

I can't remember 3.2 exactly, but I don't agree, at least when it comes to the 
desktop (plasma). And, as far as I am concerned, as long as the desktop is 
not working for me, KDE 4 is not working for me and remains on the test 
partition

Thierry


-- 
“Microsoft isn't evil,
they just make really crappy operating systems.” Linus Torvald

___________________________________________________
This message is from the kde mailing list.
Account management:  https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde.
Archives: http://lists.kde.org/.
More info: http://www.kde.org/faq.html.