Why KDE4 is called KDE?
Jose Celestino
japc at co.sapo.pt
Sat Dec 12 19:27:09 GMT 2009
On Sáb, 2009-12-12 at 19:16 +0100, Steven Crooks wrote:
> On Saturday 12 December 2009 18:30:46 Jose Celestino wrote:
> >
> > Notorious counter-example is Amarok, it went from a powerful media
> > player to a useless P.O.S.
> >
> > But I guess most of everything else (that I use, at least) as improved,
> > Digikam, Gwenview, Konsole, etc.
> >
> >
> That might be your own opinion.
Sure it is my opinion. I have the very bad habit of verbalizing my
opinion not others.
-- Jose Celestino SAPO.pt::Systems http://www.sapo.pt
--------------------------------------------------------------------- *
Progress (n.): The process through which Usenet has evolved from smart
people in front of dumb terminals to dumb people in front of smart
terminals.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde/attachments/20091212/a95645b8/attachment.sig>
-------------- next part --------------
___________________________________________________
This message is from the kde mailing list.
Account management: https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde.
Archives: http://lists.kde.org/.
More info: http://www.kde.org/faq.html.
More information about the kde
mailing list