Why KDE4 is called KDE?

[Steven Crooks]

On Saturday 12 December 2009 18:30:46 Jose Celestino wrote:
> On Qui, 2009-12-10 at 21:21 +0100, Kevin Krammer wrote:
> > On Wednesday, 2009-12-09, Draciron Smith wrote:
> > > On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 6:36 AM, Kevin Krammer <kevin.krammer at gmx.at>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > Because it tears at everything that made KDE dear to a large number of
> > > people. KDE 4 is NOT KDE except in name. It has betrayed the
> > > principles and ideas that made KDE so successful.
> >
> > Quite overgeneralizing statement.
> > Most of KDE's products is exactly like they used to be, often developed a
> > lot further, e.g. Okular surpassing KPDF by far.
> 
> Notorious counter-example is Amarok, it went from a powerful media
> player to a useless P.O.S.
> 
> But I guess most of everything else (that I use, at least) as improved,
> Digikam, Gwenview, Konsole, etc.
> 
> 
> 
> -- Jose Celestino SAPO.pt::Systems http://www.sapo.pt
> --------------------------------------------------------------------- *
> Progress (n.): The process through which Usenet has evolved from smart
> people in front of dumb terminals to dumb people in front of smart
> terminals.
> 
That might be your own opinion. I have in Amarok2 a player, which is far 
beyond 1.4 has ever been. Thats my opinion, so who's right now?
Please don't state your opinion to be everyones.

Steven
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde/attachments/20091212/7e461d2d/attachment.sig>
-------------- next part --------------
___________________________________________________
This message is from the kde mailing list.
Account management:  https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde.
Archives: http://lists.kde.org/.
More info: http://www.kde.org/faq.html.