Why KDE4 is called KDE?

[Jose Celestino]

On Qui, 2009-12-10 at 21:21 +0100, Kevin Krammer wrote:
> On Wednesday, 2009-12-09, Draciron Smith wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 6:36 AM, Kevin Krammer <kevin.krammer at gmx.at> wrote:

> > 
> > Because it tears at everything that made KDE dear to a large number of
> > people. KDE 4 is NOT KDE except in name. It has betrayed the
> > principles and ideas that made KDE so successful.
> 
> Quite overgeneralizing statement.
> Most of KDE's products is exactly like they used to be, often developed a lot 
> further, e.g. Okular surpassing KPDF by far.
> 

Notorious counter-example is Amarok, it went from a powerful media
player to a useless P.O.S.

But I guess most of everything else (that I use, at least) as improved,
Digikam, Gwenview, Konsole, etc.



-- Jose Celestino SAPO.pt::Systems http://www.sapo.pt
--------------------------------------------------------------------- *
Progress (n.): The process through which Usenet has evolved from smart
people in front of dumb terminals to dumb people in front of smart
terminals.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde/attachments/20091212/b43b95ec/attachment.sig>
-------------- next part --------------
___________________________________________________
This message is from the kde mailing list.
Account management:  https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde.
Archives: http://lists.kde.org/.
More info: http://www.kde.org/faq.html.