[OT]Re: how to edit id3 tags in KDE?
Matthew Woehlke
mw_triad at users.sourceforge.net
Fri Sep 26 04:49:10 BST 2008
James Richard Tyrer wrote:
> [snip] JPEG2000 is noticeably better because it will
> do lossless compression and doesn't have the block artifacts, yet the
> market has standardized on the old and obsolete standard causing real
> problems with digital cameras.
Not for *me* it doesn't :-D. I shot maybe a dozen pictures before
turning on lossless-compressed raw (which I realize now was a mistake,
turning on raw should have been the very first thing I did). Forget the
compression format, anyone not shooting raw is likely already losing
almost half the image quality to the camera's built-in tone mapping.
(Actually, I suppose if I fiddled with it, I could get better jpg's, but
why bother when rawstudio can produce so much better results by throwing
a general-purpose CPU at the problem?)
--
Matthew
ENOWIT: .sig file for this machine not set up yet
___________________________________________________
This message is from the kde mailing list.
Account management: https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde.
Archives: http://lists.kde.org/.
More info: http://www.kde.org/faq.html.
More information about the kde
mailing list