KDE 4 review

[Kevin Krammer]

On Saturday 14 June 2008, Dotan Cohen wrote:

> software they please. I suggest that you write to the Fedora mailing
> list concerning your feelings regarding their decision.

I don't think this would make any difference. Fedora is targeted at a user 
group who prefer to trade probability of initial problems with subsequent 
fixes over initial perfection with subsequent security only maintenance.
For example they even ship unreleased versions of software if the actual 
release is likely to happen within their version's update cycle (e.g. 
NetworkManager, Xorg)

And I think [1] they are doing a pretty good job in keeping this probability 
very low.

Cheers,
Kevin

[1] not a Fedora user myself, judging by number of reports on issuses compared 
to other somewhat experiemental distributions
-- 
Kevin Krammer, KDE developer, xdg-utils developer
KDE user support, developer mentoring
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde/attachments/20080614/200a80c8/attachment.sig>
-------------- next part --------------
___________________________________________________
This message is from the kde mailing list.
Account management:  https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde.
Archives: http://lists.kde.org/.
More info: http://www.kde.org/faq.html.