Idea for KDE Project
Andrew Wendt
awendt at putergeek.com
Thu May 29 14:24:15 BST 2003
On Thursday 29 May 2003 05:55, James Richard Tyrer wrote:
> > You would still need KDEDIRS to allow local, self compiled packages to go
> > into a different directory.
> But why would you want to do that? Except that is for the "/usr vs.
> /usr/local issue.
I do this for all packages I compile from source. I install into
/opt/<program>-<version> and symlink to there from /opt/<program>.
And then, unfortunately, I have to add something to KDEDIRS.
> Your major premise is correct, but the reason is that you can use
> KDEDIRS to solve the problem. So, if you have a long enough path in
> KDEDIRS, then you can put KDE stuff all over the place. I personally
> find this to be a horrible mess so I install all of the KDE 3
> applications in: /usr/kde3/ and all of the GNOME 2 applications in:
> /usr/gnome2/. Very neat and tidy.
It's neat and tidy, until you want to uninstall one of the programs and find
that the files are all mixed together?
Something I have wondered though... Don't most programs store the --prefix
they were ./configure'd with? Why can't KDE programs do this? They could
search their prefix directory, and then the main KDE directory, and that's
it.
Then I would not have to mess with KDEDIRS, and also one KDE app wouldn't be
searching for its files in the directories of all my other unrelated KDE
apps.
TTFN
Andy
___________________________________________________
This message is from the kde mailing list.
Account management: http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde.
Archives: http://lists.kde.org/.
More info: http://www.kde.org/faq.html.
More information about the kde
mailing list