network protocol transparency in quanta

Kevin Krammer kevin.krammer at gmx.at
Tue Aug 5 21:56:29 BST 2003


On Tuesday 05 August 2003 22:43, daniel wrote:
> so what's the deal with quanta and kate?  which one is "the" kde
> editor?  i only ask 'cause i've seen a lot of hype lately about quanta,
> and i've been using kate for some time now.

Kate and Quanta do not have the same purpose.
Kate is a general purpose editor, with extensions for programming, etc.
Quanta is mainly an editor for textual data which has a defined structure, 
such as XML or HTML.
In fact Quanta uses Kate as its default editor.

> is this limitation in quanta really there?  or have i missed something?
>  and if it is, why hasn't it been addressed?

Quanta+ is a KDE application and it should be able to use the KIO 
architecture as well as Kate.

Cheers,
Kevin

-- 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Kevin Krammer <kevin.krammer at gmx.at>
Developer at the Kmud Project http://www.kmud.de/
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: signature
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde/attachments/20030805/5d1a16b9/attachment.sig>
-------------- next part --------------
___________________________________________________
This message is from the kde mailing list.
Account management:  http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde.
Archives: http://lists.kde.org/.
More info: http://www.kde.org/faq.html.


More information about the kde mailing list