WOW. . .those screenshots of 3.1Alpha are fantastic
dwmoar at findmoore.net
Fri Jul 12 19:03:16 BST 2002
Geeze DRE, don't you have anything nice to say about anyone or anything.
I haven't really said alto on this group , but everything that I have
read that you have posted lately have been very negative towards the
originally posted. Like my daddy always told me if you can't say
anything nice, don't say anything at all. Oh I forgot should I bow down
before you now ?
my 0.02 cents
Opinion's are like assholes, we all have one and they all stink!
On Fri, 2002-07-12 at 07:54, Andreas Pour wrote:
> daniel wrote:
> > i'm still a linux newbie, and really in no position to contribute any code
> > the kde project, but i'm just wondering if the reason that there's the
> > stability issue in kde (and especially konqueror) is that konqueror isn't
> > reusing code?
> Konqueror reuses a lot of code, actually.
> > mozilla 1.0 has finally been released and instead of just copying its code
> > into konqueror, konqueror is using it's very own khtml engine right?
> > (someone correct me if i'm off here).
> It has its own rendering engine, that's correct.
> > all i'm saying is that mozilla is an excellent browser and has supported
> > tabs much longer than konqueror has -- why not just reuse thier work? it
> If you want to use Mozilla, nothing stops you, works fine in KDE. But
> Konqueror and Mozilla are quite different things. For example, konq-e,
> a "mini" Konqueror, runs on PDAs, try doing that with Mozilla. They use
> different toolkits, so Konqueror integrates better into KDE.
> It's also amazing, how much money and time went into Mozilla, maybe, I
> don't know, 1% of that, probably much less, went into Konqueror. So,
> sure, maybe it's not as far yet, in some measures, though it is further
> in others.
> So, in other words, Konqueror is improved much more efficiently, with a
> lot less effort, and uses fewer resources.
> So why don't you pop over to Mozilla's mailing lists, and ask them, why
> they don't drop their project and help work on Konqueror instead?
> And when you are done with that, why don't you hop over to the GNOME
> list, and ask them, why they don't work on KDE instead?
> And then why don't you go to the GM website and ask them, why they just
> don't sell Fords?
> Think about it.
> This message is from the kde mailing list.
> Account management: http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde.
> Archives: http://lists.kde.org/.
> More info: http://www.kde.org/faq.html.
This message is from the kde mailing list.
Account management: http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde.
More info: http://www.kde.org/faq.html.
More information about the kde