Comments on current kde-www

[Christoph Cullmann]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Friday 18 October 2002 13:10, Neil Stevens wrote:
> 1. The change to family.inc was completely redundant, and adds complexity
> to something that was going to be simple to maintain.
Fine, but to change all links on all serverpages if one server fails and you 
need to upload it somewhere under a other domain/href is "easy" ?

>
> 2. A global config.inc is going to be a maintenance hassle:  It makes it
> impossible to keep local sites config in cvs, it centralizes site data
> away from the rest of the site, it adds a redundant array.  This is a
> steep cost for a debatable mirroring scheme.
That's simply not true, you can have a own config.php on each server, that the 
current default is in cvs is not a big problem, if we have the page up 
running move it to the attic.

>
> Ohter than this one-server scheme, what was accomplished here?
>
> I think we should decide finally whether this idea of having all sites
> servable from one server is something that we want to do.  *That* decision
> will make clear whether the changes are needed.

- -- 
Christoph Cullmann
Kate/KDE developer
cullmann at kde.org
http://kate.kde.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE9sDF/yPjDGePm9UIRAiGCAJ4u+ak7UcIR7+tSClvLRgLrZuo6nQCgzUEa
3Kx/pufOElm9CfRwM7bgNuI=
=2R7B
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----