Feedback from an application developer
Andreas Pakulat
apaku at gmx.de
Fri Aug 21 17:18:02 CEST 2009
On 21.08.09 14:20:12, Thomas Friedrichsmeier wrote:
> On Friday 21 August 2009, Jaroslaw S wrote:
> > Perhaps moving to KDE SVN would be a first step into having the app
> > packaged?
>
> I know KDE is very inclusive about that. But not every project *wants* to be
> included in KDE svn, nor would this make much sense in some cases. To mention
> just *some* reasons, I like the flexibility of truely being the admin of my
> project, including the ability to hand out SVN write privileges myself, the
> (relative, but real) comfort of managing all project ressources through a
> single platform,
Those are valid reasons.
> the freedom to set release cycles that are often much
> shorter, and sometimes much longer than KDE's...
This is not. There are tons of apps in KDE svn that have their own release
cycle: amarok, k3b, koffice just to name a few prominent ones.
Andreas
--
Never commit yourself! Let someone else commit you.
More information about the Kde-windows
mailing list