Feedback from an application developer

[Thomas Friedrichsmeier]

On Friday 21 August 2009, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
> > the freedom to set release cycles that are often much
> > shorter, and sometimes much longer than KDE's...
>
> This is not. There are tons of apps in KDE svn that have their own release
> cycle: amarok, k3b, koffice just to name a few prominent ones.

Ok, true. But if the suggestion was to move that moving to KDE svn would have 
the benefit of more or less "automagic" package creation, then - all other 
issues aside - I don't see that happening on my own release schedule.

Anyway, my point was that I don't want to move rkward to KDE svn. And unless 
you expect and want *every* third party KDE based project to move into KDE 
svn, the KDE windows installer could be made more friendly to third parties 
(see the original mail).

Regards
Thomas
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-windows/attachments/20090821/48e150fe/attachment.sig