updated win32libs package

[Christian Ehrlicher]

Igor Mironchick schrieb:
> Good evening.
> 7z packages are usefull.
> But I can't understand for what this race after the universality. Is it so
> necessary to combine all functionality in a one DLL??? In my apinion this
> this may cause only problems, cause there is must to be a standart.
> 
What do you mean? There is no one big lib.
> My proposal is segregate win32libs in a to branches, looks like mingw (gcc)
> and other. This can solve many problems.
The idea behind those package is to provide all external libs needed to
start compiling kdelibs. And as all those libs are C-only libs (apart
from unused pcrecpp), I think it's the best to use one lib for both
compilers to avoid problems ("I've this dll here, but it doesn't work"
-> "Do you have the msvc or mingw version of this lib?") as much as we
can. We get enough such problems later on...
> And why, dear Christian, you are
> compile win32libs with MSVCRT80 ??? It's not so good idea too, in my
> apinion
> of cause. If I mistaken then enlighten me please.
Because I currently create thos libs with msvc8. But you're right we
should use the mingw ones to avoid this dependency. For now I'm to lazy
to recompile all with mingw as it's boring sloow (and the resulting
dll's are bigger).
I'll replace them with the mingw ones when a package needs an update.
> 
> P.S. Зачем придумывать себе проблемы :) ??? Sorry, it's in russian.
> 
Christian

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 250 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-windows/attachments/20061107/a2959d6a/attachment.pgp