kdeutils svn2git

Niko Sams niko.sams at gmail.com
Sun Dec 12 19:15:48 CET 2010


On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 18:49, Raphael Kubo da Costa <kubito at gmail.com> wrote:
> At Sun, 12 Dec 2010 16:46:06 +0100,
> Niko Sams wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I see you commited kdeutils conversion rules resulting in a single repository.
>> Are kdeutils developers in favor of a monolithic repository?
>
> Actually, I had unsubscribed from the scm-interest mailing list a few
> months ago and only followed it every once in a while via gmane. And
> it seemed like it had already been decided that SC modules would still
> be kept as modules, so I just followed that.
>
> If this is still up to discussion, then the rest of the kdeutils team
> needs to be consulted -- I'm pretty sure they didn't even know I had
> started writing the conversion rules ;)
There has been made no real decision, only lots of discussions. Afaik
the decision
has to be made by every module, as the situation is much different for
eg. koffice
and kdeedu.

>> Are there any inter module dependencies, if yes - which?
>
> Nope, I don't think any module depends on any other one (Ark has a
> cmake file in the cmake/ directory, but that's all).
In that case *I* would go the split way. However kdeutils devels have
to decide that.

In any case, I worked on split rules that include kedutils
(kdemodule-split-rules)


Niko


More information about the Kde-utils-devel mailing list