closing documents, take 2 (was: Summary of NWI -- the page)

Maciej Pilichowski bluedzins at wp.pl
Tue May 19 15:30:02 CEST 2009


On Monday 18 May 2009 20:18:07 Matthew Woehlke wrote:

> Maciej Pilichowski wrote:
> > On Saturday 16 May 2009 04:04:11 Matthew Woehlke wrote:
> >> Maciej Pilichowski wrote:
> >>> [ ] closing document closes "its" application if there are
> >>> sibling instances of that application within the container<br>
> >>
> >> Okay... this makes no sense. Why would I want the application to
> >> quit because I have more than one window open?
> >>
> > :-DDDDDDDDDDDDD It is your idea, so I assumed you have a reason
> > : for
> >
> > such behaviour :-))))))))) I only understood it as a gesture for
> > Mac users.
>
> That was my idea? 

Yes.

> I thought the options you have ticked as 
> default...

The option is your idea, the fact it is [ ] or [x] does not indicate 
who invented it :-))

> > About month ago you wrote:
> > "What about a policy that close doc will close the application
> > also if there are sibling instances of that app? I think I would
> > be okay implementing it that way."
>
> ...are what this is talking about. I am confused :-).

I am confused about what you are confused. I get this option from your 
mail, because I didn't want this feature be hardcoded :-) That's all.

> Maybe an example will help. Let's say I have four kwrite windows in
> TAI, two each belonging to one process

Wait, do we allow that one application instance (process) would have 
several windows?

Maybe it is where confusion comes from. I would say no, because 
otherwise the whole environment would become more complicated, and 
from user POV it is hard to tell if the window A and B are from the 
same or different processes.

Cheers,


More information about the Kde-usability-devel mailing list