[Kde-scm-interest] New life in kdesdk-migration-to-git :) (was: Re: Layout of "lokalize" and "kompare" git repos with plugins integrated (was: Re: Forming repos by plugin type or code domain?))

[Albert Astals Cid]

El Dissabte, 29 de desembre de 2012, a les 12:57:27, Sebastian Dörner va 
escriure:
> On 29 December 2012 00:47, Albert Astals Cid <aacid at kde.org> wrote:
> > El Divendres, 28 de desembre de 2012, a les 13:36:39, Jeremy Whiting va
> > 
> > escriure:
> > > I've also just pushed new repos to scratch/whiting using the latest
> > > rules
> > > and parentmaps.  There is one issue that some of the tags aren't
> > 
> > annotated
> > 
> > > so are failing the hook to be pushed, but otherwise check them out and
> > 
> > see
> > 
> > > if anything is missing.  I'll look into the tag issue.
> > 
> > CMake Error: The source directory "kde-dev-utils" does not appear to
> > contain
> > CMakeLists.txt.
> 
> This is because there is none. This repo is entirely new in its collection
> of utils, so we don't have a CMakeLists.txt. I would therefore argue to add
> one after the conversion.

Can we get that in then? Without it it is quite hard to know if installing the 
git repos gives me the same files that installing the svn repo since i can't 
install kde-dev-utils.

Cheers,
  Albert

> 
> > strigi-analyzers seems a weak name, it ought to be something like
> > kdesdk-string-analyzers, since the repo name will be kde:xxx and you don't
> > want to "own" kde:strigi-analyzers
> > 
> > Same for thumbnailers
> 
> I just adapted the rules to use the names kdesdk-strigi-analyzers and
> kdesdk-thumbnailers.
> 
> > the umbrello repo is huge, anything we could do so it's not that big?
> > 
> > sandsmark in git says "git gc --aggressive && git prune gets it down to
> > 28mb
> > for me" maybe we can do that to all the repos?
> 
> As we usually did that in previous conversions, I agree we should do it
> here.
> 
> > Cheers,
> > 
> >   Albert
> >   
> > > thanks,
> > > Jeremy
> > > 
> > > 
> > > On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 8:23 AM, Sebastian Dörner <
> > > 
> > > sebastian at sebastian-doerner.de> wrote:
> > > > I've been working with Jeremy (and Nicolas) so we can finally get this
> > > > over with. This is a heads-up about the strigi-analyzers. The current
> > > > situation is as follows:
> > > > 
> > > > 1)  Nobody seems to have very strong opinions about whether to have
> > > > the
> > > > analyzers with the apps or their own repo (among the stakeholders
> > > > Nick,
> > > > Kevin, Friedrich, Jeremy, me)
> > > > 2)  Nick prefers the analyzers separate, because the analyzers don't
> > > > depend on lokalize.
> > > > 3)  Kevin is unsure, would like to be consistent with whatever
> > > > Lokalize
> > > > does.
> > > > 4) KDE / Nepomuk will probably move away from strigi in the future.
> > > > 5) Currently distributions often have a separate package
> > > > kdesdk-strigi-analyzers (or similar).
> > > > 6) It is easiest from a rule-writing pov to keep the analyzers
> > 
> > separate.
> > 
> > > > Particularly because of points 4 and 5 we are currently implementing a
> > > > solution with separate repos for strigi-analyzers (all of them) and
> > > > thumbnailers. Neither the kompare nor the lokalize repo would then
> > 
> > contain
> > 
> > > > any strigi-analyzers.
> > > > If you have any objections, please bring them forward now.
> > > > 
> > > > Regards
> > > > Sebastian
> > > > 
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Kde-scm-interest mailing list
> > > > Kde-scm-interest at kde.org
> > > > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-scm-interest