[Kde-scm-interest] New life in kdesdk-migration-to-git :) (was: Re: Layout of "lokalize" and "kompare" git repos with plugins integrated (was: Re: Forming repos by plugin type or code domain?))

[Jeremy Whiting]

Ok, I added one.  It seems to build and install fine here.  Though I did
notice kde-dev-utils has both doc/kmtrace and kmtrace/doc with the same
contents  I'll see if I can find out why and not add the one in doc/kmtrace.

thanks,
Jeremy


On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 9:05 AM, Albert Astals Cid <aacid at kde.org> wrote:

> El Dissabte, 29 de desembre de 2012, a les 12:57:27, Sebastian Dörner va
> escriure:
> > On 29 December 2012 00:47, Albert Astals Cid <aacid at kde.org> wrote:
> > > El Divendres, 28 de desembre de 2012, a les 13:36:39, Jeremy Whiting va
> > >
> > > escriure:
> > > > I've also just pushed new repos to scratch/whiting using the latest
> > > > rules
> > > > and parentmaps.  There is one issue that some of the tags aren't
> > >
> > > annotated
> > >
> > > > so are failing the hook to be pushed, but otherwise check them out
> and
> > >
> > > see
> > >
> > > > if anything is missing.  I'll look into the tag issue.
> > >
> > > CMake Error: The source directory "kde-dev-utils" does not appear to
> > > contain
> > > CMakeLists.txt.
> >
> > This is because there is none. This repo is entirely new in its
> collection
> > of utils, so we don't have a CMakeLists.txt. I would therefore argue to
> add
> > one after the conversion.
>
> Can we get that in then? Without it it is quite hard to know if installing
> the
> git repos gives me the same files that installing the svn repo since i
> can't
> install kde-dev-utils.
>
> Cheers,
>   Albert
>
> >
> > > strigi-analyzers seems a weak name, it ought to be something like
> > > kdesdk-string-analyzers, since the repo name will be kde:xxx and you
> don't
> > > want to "own" kde:strigi-analyzers
> > >
> > > Same for thumbnailers
> >
> > I just adapted the rules to use the names kdesdk-strigi-analyzers and
> > kdesdk-thumbnailers.
> >
> > > the umbrello repo is huge, anything we could do so it's not that big?
> > >
> > > sandsmark in git says "git gc --aggressive && git prune gets it down to
> > > 28mb
> > > for me" maybe we can do that to all the repos?
> >
> > As we usually did that in previous conversions, I agree we should do it
> > here.
> >
> > > Cheers,
> > >
> > >   Albert
> > >
> > > > thanks,
> > > > Jeremy
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 8:23 AM, Sebastian Dörner <
> > > >
> > > > sebastian at sebastian-doerner.de> wrote:
> > > > > I've been working with Jeremy (and Nicolas) so we can finally get
> this
> > > > > over with. This is a heads-up about the strigi-analyzers. The
> current
> > > > > situation is as follows:
> > > > >
> > > > > 1)  Nobody seems to have very strong opinions about whether to have
> > > > > the
> > > > > analyzers with the apps or their own repo (among the stakeholders
> > > > > Nick,
> > > > > Kevin, Friedrich, Jeremy, me)
> > > > > 2)  Nick prefers the analyzers separate, because the analyzers
> don't
> > > > > depend on lokalize.
> > > > > 3)  Kevin is unsure, would like to be consistent with whatever
> > > > > Lokalize
> > > > > does.
> > > > > 4) KDE / Nepomuk will probably move away from strigi in the future.
> > > > > 5) Currently distributions often have a separate package
> > > > > kdesdk-strigi-analyzers (or similar).
> > > > > 6) It is easiest from a rule-writing pov to keep the analyzers
> > >
> > > separate.
> > >
> > > > > Particularly because of points 4 and 5 we are currently
> implementing a
> > > > > solution with separate repos for strigi-analyzers (all of them) and
> > > > > thumbnailers. Neither the kompare nor the lokalize repo would then
> > >
> > > contain
> > >
> > > > > any strigi-analyzers.
> > > > > If you have any objections, please bring them forward now.
> > > > >
> > > > > Regards
> > > > > Sebastian
> > > > >
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > Kde-scm-interest mailing list
> > > > > Kde-scm-interest at kde.org
> > > > > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-scm-interest
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-scm-interest/attachments/20121229/1a6a5eda/attachment.html>