[Kde-scm-interest] scripty questions

[Albert Astals Cid]

Two notes on my own mail

A Diumenge, 24 de maig de 2009, Albert Astals Cid va escriure:
> A Diumenge, 24 de maig de 2009, Thiago Macieira va escriure:
> > Chani wrote:
> > >however, pinotree doesn't think translators can handle any workflow
> > > change AT ALL, and he seems to count running anything other than "svn
> > > up" to fetch data as a workflow change.
> >
> > Well, I guess they'll have to deal with change.
> >
> > I'm sorry, but we can't be held back by stubbornness. If they have valid
> > concerns, we'll address. Otherwise, deal with it.
>
> This reminds me the a blog i posted regardless i18n and how KDE treats as
> important.
>
> if you/Chani/Aaron/Matt
Here a "etc" is missing, that is, i'm not saying it's only you but the group 
of people that push for git but don't have any i18n knowledge.

> that i doubt ever translated anything in KDE, use
> KDE in english, have not dealt with translators and do not know the KDE
> translation workflow are the ones that are going to decide what is a valid
> concern, i'm out of the i18n coordinator position and probably out of KDE
> as a whole.

Ok, you can call this an overreaction, and it is.

The problem is that this seems more and more a battle when we are all friends 
and we all want the better for KDE which makes this kind of 
aggressive/destructive arguments/discussions pointless/dumb.

Albert

>
> Albert
> _______________________________________________
> Kde-scm-interest mailing list
> Kde-scm-interest at kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-scm-interest