[Kde-scm-interest] meeting summary

[Jeff Mitchell]

Thiago Macieira wrote:
> Em Sexta-feira 11. Dezembro 2009, às 00.29.59, Chani escreveu:
>> On December 10, 2009 15:13:44 Thiago Macieira wrote:
>>> Em Quinta-feira 10. Dezembro 2009, às 18.09.14, Jeff Mitchell escreveu:
>>>>> We aren't going to switch to Gitorious with the current merge request
>>>>> situation. Its a blocker. Still a blocker.
>>>> Why is it a blocker?
>>> Why is it a showstopper to not have a feature we didn't have in SVN?
>> because svn doesn't email you every project's merge requests (since it
>>  doesn't *have* merge requests, but that's besides the point).
>> imagine if suddenly reviewboard started sending all the mail it currently
>> sends to mailing lists and directly-involved people to every person who has
>>  an svn account.
> 
> Reviewboard isn't SVN. That's completely unrelated here, because Reviewboard 
> can work with Git too.
> 
> What I don't understand is how we consider a showstopper to not have a feature 
> we currently don't have either way. Just don't turn on the feature of sending 
> merge request notifications by email and we'll have the same situation as we 
> have with SVN.

Right. This discussion flip-flopped in a weird way, because now you're
complaining about blocker behavior that's quite different than what Ian
was complaining about. He was complaining that now it's too hard to get
merge requests -- you're complaining that it's too hard *not* to get them.

The latter problem is most certainly solved.

--Jeff

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 261 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-scm-interest/attachments/20091211/8f774cae/attachment.sig