No Bugreports for "old" Versions

Hartmut Noack zettberlin at linuxuse.de
Fri Feb 3 00:26:46 CET 2006


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1



Michael Pyne schrieb:
> On Thursday 02 February 2006 16:39, Hartmut Noack wrote:

> 
> Well if it's a known bug that is already fixed in current KDE versions, that 
> may be one reason why the bug tracker would complain.


The bug is known and someone has mentioned it exactly the same as i
would have done the existing report was filed for a Version of 0.8.0
that was named "experimental" i run the official "final"-version 0.8.0
and the bug is still alive as announced in the bugreport that is marked
as "closed" and "RESOLVED"

> Just for clarification, what is your current version of KDE (and DigiKam)?  

KDE 3.4.2 digikam 0.8.0 KDE is as shipped with the recent Novell Suse
10.0 that is, both is the stuff, that is really used out there: no
normal user installs a complete KDE from anything else than his/her
Distrorepositories and the most users will use the stuff on their CDs.

to avoid misunderstandings here: i do *not* talk about digikam here but
about the bugtrackingsystem and the policy of KDE regarding the
question, what is a "recent" version.

I am absolutely convinced, that KDE would gain trenedous profit from a
slow-down of releasing new Versions. Release a new Version and watch it
working for average users for at least 6 - better 12 Months, than
release a new version and do the same again.

best regards
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFD4pU11Aecwva1SWMRAjNRAJ0boNN65bpOTmtImxXqllwHHItxSgCdGgAG
c8BCO9NvuxhDZdxHT4vnemw=
=vPbY
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


More information about the kde-quality mailing list