DANGER Fedora
Stanislav Karchebny
berk at upnet.ru
Sat May 15 13:55:29 CEST 2004
On Saturday 01 May 2004 11:38, James Richard Tyrer wrote:
> >>Stanislav Karchebny wrote:
> >>>I propose contact fedore packages maintainer(s) directly instead
> >>>of spamming the ml. We would love to hear their feedback instead,
> >>>gladly.
> >>>Trolling us all with engineering quality rants is not a good
> >>>attitude either.
[snip]
> I just thought that Stanislav Karchebny's remark was indicative of the
> problem. Discussions of design/engineering and quality are considered to
> be SPAM by developers.
[snip]
I said "rants", I didn't say "constructive talk" tho.
I am all open for architecture discussion that is taken from a design point of
view, not from some ranting like "You stupid developers don't see the
enlightenment I bring and therefore you suck." Neither it that we can't stand
your light - we're just having our fun and let others have their.
Design is good, and in this matter a design of fedore can be much improved.
--
keep in touch. berkus.
Roey on #kde-devel: when I hear best of breed I tune out--it's too much a
buzzword. What I carry between my legs is best of breed. And like KDE, just
because it's less visible doesn't mean it gets less usage.
More information about the kde-quality
mailing list