Quality Teams on the wiki

Carlos Leonhard Woelz carloswoelz at imap-mail.com
Mon Mar 8 17:20:15 CET 2004


On Mon, 08 Mar 2004 08:30:48 -0800, "Mark Berry" <mark at bx2.net> said:
> 
> I 100% agree that we need to kick the information on each page minimal, 
> as too much will be disgarded.  I guess it's just to be discussed which 
> tasks belong to individual apps and which to a package.  I see some of 
> the tasks of testing/documentation and patch-testing for example, to 
> broad to be done at a package level, and the package wicki will get VERY 
> cluttered with some of the current packages. 

Agreed.

When I first imagined the structure of the Quality Team wiki, it was
application based. Than I realised exactly that: nobody would read it if
there is too much info. Currenlty, I see the application pages as a tool
for people who are currently working on that app, to coordinate effortas
and to show stuff. People are free to create them, and link from the
module page.

BTW: why we use "modules" instead of "packages" to organize the wiki:

- Modules are KDE CVS main folders. Each module contains applications,
code, docs, etc... that are somewhat related, and additionaly, you get
them together when you compile that module. It is the natural
organization inside KDE.

- Packages are pre compiled or source code distribution facilities.
Packages are never clearly defined and vary across distros, as
distributors are free to group them as they wish.
-- 
  Carlos Leonhard Woelz
  carloswoelz at imap-mail.com

-- 
http://www.fastmail.fm - Sent 0.000002 seconds ago


More information about the kde-quality mailing list