January/February KDE PIM summary blog post

[Sandro Knauß]

Hey,

I can create the blog post.

>  don't think it's necessary to label them as "non core team" because, quite 
frankly, is there even a core PIM team?

My main motivation is to show that also new people showing up and to give them 
extra credits and visibility as it is a lot work to get your first patch.
I'm on your side that "non core team" is more expressing a hierarchy and 
exclusive club.

Maybe the best is to mention the review work separately:
A lot people helped to process nearly 120 MRs the last 2 months. Reviewing and 
finally merging over 80 of them.

Can anyone have an idea how to get some statistics about how many MR are 
processed? By not doing it by hand in 
https://invent.kde.org/groups/pim/-/merge_requests?
page=7&scope=all&sort=updated_desc&state=all

and https://invent.kde.org/groups/pim/-/activity
Claudio Cambra, Laurent Montel, Sandro Knauß, David Jarvie, Ingo Klöcker, 
Volker Krause, Carl Schwan, Jan Kundrát, Nicolas Fella, Albert Astals Cid, 
Fabian Vogt, Adriaan de Groot, ...

@volker: where do I find the changelog script? I would like to get the 
information what all the contributors did, that have less than 1 or 2 commits. 
Than I can also credit them.

hefee

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-pim/attachments/20220226/4e9208e9/attachment.sig>